Dr. Mladen Stojiljković, LL.M.
Partner
Referenzen
Empfohlen von Who's Who Legal als "Thought Leader Global Elite – Commercial Litigation – under 45 2023"
Empfohlen von Who’s Who Legal (2021 and 2022) als einer der angesehensten in dieser Kategorie "Future Leaders – Europe, Middle East, and Africa – Non-Partners – Commercial Litigation" (Europe, Middle East and Africa)
Who's Who Legal Future Leader (Arbitration, seit 2019; Litigation, seit 2018)
Empfohlen in Leader’s League (International Arbitration: "sehr empfohlen"; Dispute Resolution: "exzellent")
Empfohlen von Legal 500 für Litigation und Arbitration
Empfohlen von Euromoney/Legal Media Group’s Expert Guides als “Rising Star” in “Commercial Arbitration”
Anwaltszulassungen
Schweiz (2010)
Kalifornien (2022)
Berufserfahrung
seit 2023 Partner bei Nater Dallafior Rechtsanwälte AG
Counsel bei Vischer, Zürich (2019-2023)
Senior Associate bei Homburger, Zürich (2015-2019)
International Counsel bei Williams & Connolly, Washington, D.C. (2014-2015)
Associate bei Homburger, Zürich (2011-2013)
Ausbildung
Columbia Law School, LL.M. (2014)
Studien an der Universität Zürich (lic. iur., 2007; Dr. iur., 2014)
Weitere Tätigkeiten
Schiedsrichter bei der International Chamber of Commerce (Schweizer Liste)
Autor beim digitalen Rechtsprechungskommentar von Weblaw für "IPR/IZPR und Arbitration" sowie "Zivilprozessrecht"
Publikationen & Vorträge
The Parties’ Obligatiions of Diligence When Challenging Arbitrators – Two Recent Cases From Switzerland and England, in: b-Arbitra (forthcoming)
Der Vorausverzicht auf die Revision von Schiedsurteilen, Case Note on Decision 4A_69/2022, dRSK, Weblaw, 3. März 2023 (with A. Winter)
Strenge Präklusionsvorschrift bei unbezifferten Forderungsklagen, Case Note on Decision 4A_581/2021, dRSK, Weblaw, 23. Februar 2023 (with A. Müller)
Art. 18-21 LugÜ (jurisdiction in employment matters), in: Basler Kommentar, Lugano Übereinkommen, 3. Aufl., 2023
Wer entscheidet über die Rechtzeitigkeit der Aberkennungsklage – Betreibungsamt oder ausländisches Schiedsgericht?, Case Note on Decision 5A_496/2021, dRSK, Weblaw, 9. September 2022
Art. 30a, 261-264, 266-267, 268-270, in: Basler Kommentar, Schuldbetreibungs- und Konkursgesetz, 3. Aufl. 2022 (with M. Staehelin)
Zur Substanziierungslast der nicht beweisbelasteten Partei, Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Zivilprozess- und Zwangsvollstreckungsrecht (ZZZ), 57/2022, 3-6
Swiss Federal Court addresses waiver clause under Article 192 PILA, Case Note on Decision 4A_382/2021, in digitaler Rechtsprechungskommentar (dRSK), Weblaw, 16. Dezember 2021
Contract Interpretation under the CISG from the perspective of Swiss law: selected issues, in: Unifikacija prava i pravna sigurnost, Zbornik radova 33. Susreta Kopaoničke škole prirodnog prava – Slobodan Perović, Tom III, Belgrad, 2020, 53-63
Subjective Interpretation of Arbitration Agreements and Judicial Review, Case Note on Decision 4A_418/2019, dRSK, Weblaw, 24. September 2020
Burden and Standard of Proof in Investment Arbitration, in Investment Treaty Arbitration Law Review, 5th Ed., 2020 (with D. Favalli)
Arrestprosequierung mittels Schiedsklage, Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Zivilprozess- und Zwangsvollstreckungsrecht (ZZZ), 2020, 21-29
Zur Auslegung von Schiedsvereinbarungen, Case Note on Decision 4A_342/2019, dRSK, Weblaw, 31. März 2020 (with S. Pfenninger)
Swiss Federal Court Addresses Jurisdiction and Admissibility in CAS Arbitration, Case Note on Decision 4A_413/2019, dRSK, Weblaw, 17. Dezember 2019
State Immunity from Enforcement and the New York Convention, Case Note on Decision 5A_942/2017 (BGE 144 III 441), dRSK, Weblaw, 30. September 2019
Non-Signatories and Article II of the New York Convention, Case Note on Decision 4A_646/2018 (BGE 145 III 199), dRSK, Weblaw, 22. Juli 2019
Zur Schiedsfähigkeit arbeitsrechtlicher Streitigkeiten, Case Note on Decision 4A_7/2018 (BGE 144 III 235), dRSK, Weblaw, 31. Mai 2018
Arbitration clauses in corporate bylaws, Case Note on Decision 4A_344/2017, dRSK, Weblaw, 21. März 2018
The arbitration agreement: an unreviewable finding of fact?, Case Note on Decision 4A_150/2017, dRSK, Weblaw, 21. Februar 2018
Waiving any recourse against the arbitral award – do parties waive also the right to request revision?, Case Note on Decision 4A_53/2017 (BGE 143 III 589), dRSK, Weblaw, 19. Dezember 2017
Swiss Supreme Court Addresses Judicial Reviewability of Interim Awards on Jurisdiction, Case Note on Decision 4A_98/2017 (BGE 143 III 462), dRSK, Weblaw, 18. August 2017
Challenging Interim Awards on Jurisdiction in Swiss-seated Arbitrations, Euromoney Commercial Arbitration Expert Guide 2017 (with G. Naegeli)
Arbitral Jurisdiction and Court Review: Three Swiss Federal Supreme Court Decisions to Reconsider, ASA Bulletin 4/2016, 897-913
The Challenge of an Arbitral Award on the Basis of Pararegulatory Texts, in: D. Favalli (Hrsg.), Sense and Nonsense of Guidelines, Rules and Other Pararegulatory Texts, ASA Special Series No. 37, 2015 (with B. Gross)
Art. 18-21 LugÜ (jurisdiction in employment matters), in: Basler Kommentar, Lugano Übereinkommen, 1st ed. 2011 und 2nd ed. 2015 (both with B. Meyer)
Die Kontrolle der schiedsgerichtlichen Zuständigkeit, Zürich/St. Gallen 2014 (Diss. Zürich 2014)
Perjury in Arbitral Proceedings, Global Arbitration Review, 29. Juli 2011 (with T. Müller)
Untaugliches Widerspruchsverfahren im Kartellrecht – Wenn Firmen auf offene Fragen nach dem Erlaubten keine Antwort erhalten, in: Neue Zürcher Zeitung, Nr. 163, 17. Juli 2009 (with K. Neff)
Technology and Latest Developments in Arbitration, Crypto Arbitration, Moldova Arbitration Days, Chisinau, Moldova, 7 May 2024
Striving for ’Perfect” Arbitration Legislation, Cambridge Arbitration Day, Cambridge, UK, 20 April 2024
Disputes in Uncertain Times, DIS40 Zurich, Genf, 30 November 2022
Diversity in Arbitration, Belgrade Arbitration Conference 2022, Belgrade, 1 April 2022
Is Joinder in Arbitration Up to the Challenge, ICC YAF & YAAP, Vienna/online, 27 March 2021
Utjecaj pandemije Covid-19 na arbitražni postupak – izazovi, iskustva i (tehnološka) rješenja – Influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on the arbitral procedure – challenges, experience, and (technological) solutions, Young Croatian Arbitration Practitioners (YCAP)/Under 40 Section of the Serbian Arbitraiton Association, online, 8 May 2020
Dos and Dont's of Cross-Examination, Cross-Examination Workshop, ASA Below 40/Swiss Chambers' Arbitration Institution/Geneva Chamber of Commerce, Genf, 28 February 2019
Structuring Dispute Resolution Clauses in Investment Projects: Dos and Don’t's, Sarajevo Arbitration Days, Sarajevo, 24 October 2018
The Brush-up of Chapter 12 of the Swiss Private International Law Act, Belgrade Arbitration Conference 2018, Belgrade, March 2018
The Arbitrator's Duty to Disclose Potential Conflicts, ICC Young Arbitrators' Forum, Zurich, 8 December 2017
Determining the Arbitral Procedure, ASA Below 40, Genf, June 2016
The Arbitrator as Settlement Facilitator, Guest Lecture in Course "Advocacy in International Arbitration", Yale Law School, New Haven (CT), April 2016
Jurisdiction and Choice of Law, Guest Lecture in Course "Advocacy in International Arbitration", Yale Law School, New Haven (CT), February 2015
I am super impressed by the team at Nater Dallafior and Mladen Stojiljkovic in particular. [...] He is super responsive. I can reach him at any time of day, and he is a great counsel.
CHAMBERS EUROPE & CHAMBERS GLOBAL
Chambers & Partners - client feedbackMladen Stojiljkovic achieves recognition as a top litigator who is appreciated by clients as a ‘practitioner with great academic background and a pleasure to work with.
WHO'S WHO LEGAL
Mladen is [a] brilliant arbitration practitioner.
WHO'S WHO LEGAL
Highly regarded for his top-tier counsel work.
WHO'S WHO LEGAL